Official Response
The Record
After the transition from the old server, the former owner (Dino) made several public claims that are factually incorrect. This page addresses each one directly with evidence. We're not interested in drama — we're interested in the truth being accessible to anyone who looks us up.
Context — How SwordfallSMP Actually Started
franchise was running a small Minehut server. VoidHit reached out, offered his custom plugin, and said he could get someone to pay for proper Apex hosting. franchise said yes, VoidHit brought in chose as the funder, and all three launched what became SwordfallSMP together. VoidHit wrote the rules, set up the Discord, built the plugin, and got the server running. This was a collaborative build from day one — not VoidHit "joining" someone else's project. It was his project too.
After a period of working on the server, VoidHit was removed by Dino from the previous ArcaneSMP Discord following a dispute over admin conduct. franchise, chose, and VoidHit then relaunched independently under the SwordfallSMP name. Dino subsequently made several public announcements accusing VoidHit of malicious behaviour. Those claims are addressed one by one below.
Origin
How VoidHit and franchise built the server — timestamped conversation
The conversation below is from the Discord DM thread between VoidHit (NightUmbraX) and franchise on February 20, 2026 — the day everything started. Every message is timestamped and shown in screenshots below. franchise himself is a live witness to this conversation and can confirm it.
Dino's narrative frames VoidHit as someone who snuck into a server and sabotaged it from the inside. The reality is visible in plain text: VoidHit came to franchise with a custom plugin he'd already built, arranged for chose to fund proper Apex hosting, and wrote the full server rules — all in the first conversation. franchise gave him Co-Owner the same day.
Dino's narrative frames VoidHit as someone who snuck into a server and sabotaged it from the inside. The reality is visible in plain text: VoidHit came to franchise with a custom plugin he'd already built, arranged for chose to fund proper Apex hosting, and wrote the full server rules — all in the first conversation. franchise gave him Co-Owner the same day.
💬 Discord DM — NightUmbraX ↔ franchise — Feb 20 2026
NightUmbraX 12:02 — I have my own plugin, that is custom made.
NightUmbraX 12:02 — Do you want me to work for you?
franchise 12:06 — if you want
franchise 12:06 — added u to whitelist and op
NightUmbraX 12:14 — Nah I'll be getting someone to pay for an actual apex hosting.
franchise 12:15 — WAIt what?? damn bro i didnt know you were gonna do all that
NightUmbraX 12:19 — Here are the rules for you. [wrote all 9 server rules]
franchise 12:21 — those rules are good
franchise 12:21 — ill make u co-owner
NightUmbraX 12:22 — This guy will be the payer. [introduces chose]
franchise 12:22 — damn bro tysm for doing all this
Timestamped transcript — verified by franchise (server owner) as a direct participant in this conversation
VoidHit brought the plugin, arranged the hosting funding, and wrote the rules — all before franchise even gave him Co-Owner. This isn't a claim. It's a timestamped conversation that franchise himself participated in and can verify.
Claim #0 — Context
Dino unbanned EV15ER8R — a player he knew was racist and had been asked to ban
Before Dino ever made any claims about VoidHit, this happened: a player called EV15ER8R was caught using hard racial slurs in the in-game chat — repeatedly and aggressively. VoidHit filed a full formal staff report to Dino on February 12, 2026, with a recording link and detailed written account, requesting EV15ER8R be demoted at minimum or banned.
Dino banned EV15ER8R. Then, weeks later during the dispute with VoidHit, Dino admitted in a direct message: "i unbanned everyone u told me to ban." He unbanned a player he knew was racist — specifically to spite VoidHit. When VoidHit then asked Dino in the same conversation "Didn't you unban the racist guy?" Dino did not deny it.
This context matters because Dino is the same person making character accusations about VoidHit's integrity. He unbanned a known racist as a personal power move.
Dino banned EV15ER8R. Then, weeks later during the dispute with VoidHit, Dino admitted in a direct message: "i unbanned everyone u told me to ban." He unbanned a player he knew was racist — specifically to spite VoidHit. When VoidHit then asked Dino in the same conversation "Didn't you unban the racist guy?" Dino did not deny it.
This context matters because Dino is the same person making character accusations about VoidHit's integrity. He unbanned a known racist as a personal power move.
⚠️ The following screenshot contains a hard racial slur directed at players in chat. It is included as direct evidence of what VoidHit was reporting — not gratuitously.
In-game Minecraft chat — EV15ER8R typing slurs. VoidHit's response ("Bro is so madd / And racist / What a piece of shit") shows he reported it, not endorsed it.
Staff report — Feb 12 2026 — VoidHit's full formal report to Dino asking for EV15ER8R to be banned. Includes a Dropbox recording link as evidence.
DM — Dino to VoidHit — Dino admits "i unbanned everyone u told me to ban" — confirming he reversed VoidHit's bans including EV15ER8R's.
Dino unbanned a player he knew had been using racial slurs in chat — a player VoidHit had formally reported with audio evidence. He did this during a personal dispute with VoidHit as a power move, and admitted it in DMs. This is the conduct of the person making character accusations about VoidHit.
Claim #1
"VoidHit hid bad / malicious code in the plugin"
Dino publicly stated in the old server's announcements channel that VoidHit "put malicious stuff in our code" and that this is why he was demoted. This is false.
The plugin's entire source code is available in the plugin zip delivered to the server. Every single file is visible and readable. There is no obfuscated code, no hidden network calls, no backdoors. Anyone who downloads the plugin source can verify this themselves. The only code VoidHit added that Dino considered "bad" was the standard IP tracker that every Minecraft server plugin uses — logging which IP addresses connect to the server, which is normal server administration and not malicious in any way.
The plugin's entire source code is available in the plugin zip delivered to the server. Every single file is visible and readable. There is no obfuscated code, no hidden network calls, no backdoors. Anyone who downloads the plugin source can verify this themselves. The only code VoidHit added that Dino considered "bad" was the standard IP tracker that every Minecraft server plugin uses — logging which IP addresses connect to the server, which is normal server administration and not malicious in any way.
Dino's announcement — Claims VoidHit put malicious code in the plugin. The plugin source is fully open and readable.
False claim. The plugin source is open. There is no malicious code. The IP logging is standard server-side practice, not surveillance. Download the plugin zip from this site and read every file yourself.
Claim #2
"Don't use the website — VoidHit is saving IPs and doing weird stuff with them"
Dino warned players not to visit this website, claiming VoidHit is "100% saving IPs and doing weird shit with them." This is false.
This website does not run any custom backend. It is a static HTML file — there is no server-side code, no database, no IP logging. You can right-click this page, view the source, and confirm there is no tracking script anywhere. The only external requests are Google Fonts (for the typography) and the Discord invite. That's it. No analytics, no IP collection, no backend of any kind.
If Dino is referring to the Minecraft server itself logging IPs — yes, every Minecraft server does this. That's standard. It's not "weird."
This website does not run any custom backend. It is a static HTML file — there is no server-side code, no database, no IP logging. You can right-click this page, view the source, and confirm there is no tracking script anywhere. The only external requests are Google Fonts (for the typography) and the Discord invite. That's it. No analytics, no IP collection, no backend of any kind.
If Dino is referring to the Minecraft server itself logging IPs — yes, every Minecraft server does this. That's standard. It's not "weird."
Dino's announcement — Tells players not to use the website, claims IPs are being harvested.
False claim. This site is a static HTML file with no backend. Right-click → View Page Source to verify there is no IP tracking script anywhere on this page.
Claim #3
"VoidHit opped himself and gave god loot / cheated"
Dino posted an announcement claiming VoidHit "opped himself and another kid and gave each other god loot" and presented what he called proof. Notably, in a later message in the same thread, Dino himself wrote that "all that shit fake" — acknowledging the claim and its proof were fabricated.
The screenshots Dino presented as "proof" were taken out of context from server console during routine actions. The items he claimed were "given" were actually items that Dino's own clearlag system wiped — as Dino himself eventually admitted when he posted "IT GOT WIPED CUS I DROPPED IT IN CLEARLAG."
The screenshots Dino presented as "proof" were taken out of context from server console during routine actions. The items he claimed were "given" were actually items that Dino's own clearlag system wiped — as Dino himself eventually admitted when he posted "IT GOT WIPED CUS I DROPPED IT IN CLEARLAG."
Same message thread — Dino posts "cheating proof" then later writes "lmao all that shit fake" in the same announcements channel.
Retracted by Dino himself. He posted the accusation, then stated it was fake in the same channel. The items were cleared by his own server's clearlag system.
Claim #4
"VoidHit tried to dox people"
In a direct message to VoidHit, Dino stated: "and tried to dox people." This is a serious accusation — doxing means publishing someone's private personal information to harm or harass them. VoidHit's immediate response was three consecutive "Proof?" messages.
Dino provided no evidence. None. He did not name a victim, link a screenshot, share a log, or describe a specific incident. Instead, he immediately shifted to personal insults: telling VoidHit nobody liked him, that he's annoying, and making crude comments. The accusation was abandoned the moment it was challenged.
It is worth noting that Dino himself previously accused VoidHit of "saving IPs" via the website — which as shown in Claim #2 is false. Dino appears to be confusing standard server logging (which every Minecraft server does) with doxing. They are not the same thing.
Dino provided no evidence. None. He did not name a victim, link a screenshot, share a log, or describe a specific incident. Instead, he immediately shifted to personal insults: telling VoidHit nobody liked him, that he's annoying, and making crude comments. The accusation was abandoned the moment it was challenged.
It is worth noting that Dino himself previously accused VoidHit of "saving IPs" via the website — which as shown in Claim #2 is false. Dino appears to be confusing standard server logging (which every Minecraft server does) with doxing. They are not the same thing.
DM — doxing accusation — Dino says "and tried to dox people." VoidHit asks "Proof? Proof? Proof?" three times. Dino responds with personal insults. Zero evidence provided.
DM continuation — After no evidence is given, Dino moves to: "nobody liked u in the server" and crude personal attacks. The accusation is never substantiated.
No evidence. No victim named. No incident described. When directly asked for proof three times in a row, Dino responded with personal insults instead. An accusation of doxing with zero supporting evidence is not a claim — it's a smear.
Conduct
Dino's private messages during this dispute — full picture
⚠️ The following screenshots contain explicit language directed at VoidHit. They are included because the same person making public integrity accusations was sending these privately at the same time.
Below is the DM thread between Dino and VoidHit on February 20, 2026 — the day of the dispute. While Dino was publicly calling VoidHit a manipulator who hid malicious code, built a phishing website, doxed people, and cheated on the server, he was simultaneously sending these messages in private. Several key admissions stand out:
• "i unbanned everyone u told me to ban" — Dino admits reversing VoidHit's bans, including EV15ER8R's.
• "ig im toxic tho" — Dino concedes his own toxicity mid-argument.
• When asked for proof of doxing, no proof is given — only insults.
• The language used toward VoidHit throughout speaks for itself.
• "i unbanned everyone u told me to ban" — Dino admits reversing VoidHit's bans, including EV15ER8R's.
• "ig im toxic tho" — Dino concedes his own toxicity mid-argument.
• When asked for proof of doxing, no proof is given — only insults.
• The language used toward VoidHit throughout speaks for itself.
DM — key admission — "i unbanned everyone u told me to ban / mind u u hid bad code in our plugin" — admits the unban while making a baseless code claim.
DM — "tried to dox people" — Accusation made, proof asked for three times, no proof given. Dino moves straight to insults.
DM — personal attacks — "nobody liked u in the server" — after failing to provide evidence, Dino shifts entirely to personal attacks.
DM — conduct throughout — The tone and language Dino used with VoidHit privately, while simultaneously making public integrity accusations.
Judge the two parties by how they behaved, not just what they said publicly. VoidHit responded to accusations by asking for proof. Dino responded to requests for proof with insults, admissions, and crude personal attacks. The contrast is clear.
Preemptive Response
"The screenshots are photoshopped / faked"
We expect this to be Dino's response to the evidence on this page — that the screenshots are manipulated or fabricated. This section addresses that before it even happens, because this is the only move left once every other claim has been refuted with no counter-evidence.
Here is why the screenshots cannot be reasonably claimed as faked:
Here is why the screenshots cannot be reasonably claimed as faked:
Multiple independent witnesses. The Discord conversations shown involve multiple people — franchise, NightUmbraX (VoidHit), chose, and others. Each person who participated in those conversations can verify the screenshots match what they saw. Fabricating screenshots that multiple live witnesses can contradict is not a viable strategy.
Discord message IDs are immutable metadata. Every Discord message has a unique snowflake ID embedded in it. Message IDs encode the exact millisecond the message was sent and cannot be altered retroactively. Discord's own API can verify a message ID matches the content shown. If Dino believes a screenshot is fake, he can ask Discord to verify the message ID — we welcome that.
Dino has not produced counter-screenshots. If a screenshot showed something that didn't happen, the person it shows could simply share their own Discord history for that conversation. Dino has not done this for any of the claims on this page. Claiming "fake" without showing what the real version looks like is not a rebuttal.
The in-game chat screenshot is from Minecraft's built-in report screen. The EV15ER8R screenshot is taken from inside Minecraft's official "Select Chat Messages to Report" UI — a system built into the game itself, not a third-party tool. The UI cannot be spoofed to display arbitrary text while in that report mode. It is pulling directly from the server's chat history.
Dino himself never asked for proof when these claims were first made. When VoidHit asked "Proof? Proof? Proof?" about the doxing accusation, Dino responded with personal insults — not with a counter-screenshot. Someone who was being falsely accused with fabricated evidence would present their real logs. Dino did not.
A "photoshopped" claim after providing no evidence of your own is a last resort. Every claim Dino made has been rebutted here with named evidence and witnesses. Responding to that with "all fake" — with no alternative screenshots, no message ID challenges, no witness statements — is not a defence. It's a concession that there's nothing left to say.
If you believe the screenshots are faked: Ask franchise directly — he was in most of these conversations and can confirm what was said. His Discord is travisphonk. He is the server owner. He has every reason to tell the truth. If his account matches what's shown here, the screenshots are real. That's the simplest verification available.
Context
Dino's full public announcement after leaving
For full transparency, here are the actual announcements Dino posted in the old server after being removed. These are the posts that players saw and that caused the confusion SwordfallSMP is addressing here.
Old server announcements — Dino's post calling VoidHit and chose manipulators. He also admitted mid-post that "every big server has seen a little bit of admin abuse" — conceding he had admin abused.
SwordfallSMP's position: We hold no grudge. Dino built ArcaneSMP and it had a good run. The transition happened because it needed to. The false claims needed to be addressed publicly because they were made publicly. That's done now. If you have more questions, join the Discord.